Scores, ranks, answer keys, and an impossible review queue.
Item analytics can show a weak topic. They do not reliably show the first place a learner's reasoning stopped holding.
Post-mock reasoning repair for JEE
See where reasoning breaks.Repair it before the next mock.
MySquire is designed to help coaching teams move beyond answer keys: isolate the first unsupported step, test the likely cause, guide a correction, and check the idea on a fresh problem.
Illustrative prototype · no student data is saved
Trace 014
Algebra · prototypeFind all real valuesx² = 9
Step 01 · verifiedx² = 9
Step 02 · inspectx = √9
branch lostRecording slip52%
Rule-level gap48%
Next move
abstain firstAsk one question that separates the explanations.
Designed for
Class 11 JEE mathematicsPost-mock reviewFaculty-guided pilotsDelayed transfer checks
01 / Problem
The gap after every test
A score says what went wrong. It rarely explains why.
Faculty can review a handful of scripts deeply—or move on with the syllabus. MySquire is being built for the space between those choices: fast, evidence-aware reasoning repair for every eligible error.
Evidence for the next best teaching move.
A short repair for the learner and an actionable pattern for faculty—without pretending one wrong answer reveals a mind.
02 / Method
From error to next action
A bounded loop. Not an open-ended chatbot.
Each step earns the right to make the next claim. When the evidence is weak, the system asks or abstains.
Localize the break
Preserve the unaided work and identify the first transition that cannot yet be justified.
Keep causes provisional
Separate the observable error from possibilities such as a slip, a forgotten condition, or a rule-level gap.
Ask one useful probe
Choose a short question whose answers distinguish the leading explanations instead of forcing a label.
Repair, then fade help
Give the minimum useful explanation, require reconstruction, and move to a fresh no-hint problem.
Turn evidence into action
Give faculty the pattern, source evidence, confidence, affected learners, and one bounded reteach check.
Interactive prototype
One wrong line. Two possible reasons. One better question.
Walk through the complete reasoning-repair loop. The scenario is deterministic and illustrative, so every claim remains inspectable.
- 1Work
- 2Evidence
- 3Probe
- 4Repair
- 5Transfer
- 6Action
Original attempt
Find all real values of x that satisfy x² = 9.
An answer key can mark this incomplete. The harder question is whether the missing branch was a slip or reflects a reusable rule gap.
Student workAttempt 01
01x² = 9valid
02x = √9check
03x = 3result
03 / Payoff
One evidence trail, two views
Useful for the learner. Actionable for faculty.
Fix the reason marks keep leaking.
- Start from the learner's own attempt
- Receive a bounded hint before a solution
- Prove the repair on an unaided variant
Know what to reteach—and who still needs help.
- Inspect source work and uncertainty
- Group only high-confidence patterns
- Override, escalate, and recheck later
04 / Trust
Confidence is part of the product
Know what was checked, inferred, and left unresolved.
Math before language
Supported transitions are checked with bounded rules before an explanation is phrased.
Competing hypotheses
Plausible causes stay separate until another response provides useful evidence.
Designed to abstain
Unknown is a valid result. Unsupported certainty should route to faculty, not the learner.
Human-visible trail
Faculty can inspect the work, probe, confidence, and suggested action before relying on it.
05 / Validation
Targets, not traction
We will measure learning after the assistance disappears.
These are the outcomes a paid pilot is designed to test. They are not presented as achieved results.
Do repaired errors recur on an unaided variant?
Can the student apply the corrected idea after a delay?
Does the action packet reduce net review effort?
How often do faculty override or escalate a diagnosis?
Three design partners
Help shape the first post-mock reasoning clinic.
We are looking for a small number of JEE coaching teams that run regular tests, care about repeated errors, and are willing to evaluate the workflow against their current review process.
Straight answers
Before we work together.
MySquire is early. The boundaries are intentional, and the hard questions belong in public.
Is MySquire a homework solver?
No. The first product is a bounded post-mock workflow. It starts from an attempted solution, withholds unsupported certainty, and checks whether a repaired idea transfers to another problem.
Can one wrong answer reveal a misconception?
Usually not. The same answer can come from a conceptual gap, a forgotten rule, notation, or a slip. MySquire treats possible causes as hypotheses and uses a short probe before it presents a diagnosis.
Does this replace faculty?
No. During early pilots, every learner-facing diagnosis is intended to be human-reviewed. Faculty receive the evidence, confidence, affected learners, and a suggested action—not a black-box label.
What is live today?
The experience on this website is an illustrative, deterministic prototype. It demonstrates the intended reasoning loop; it is not a production AI tutor and does not store student data.
What would a design partner provide?
A regular mock-test cadence, de-identified questions and attempts under an agreement, a mathematics faculty reviewer, and willingness to compare repeat-error and workflow outcomes.